Gifted Underachievers
Gifted Underachievers
What's Wrong with Working for Exposure?
0:00
-37:10

What's Wrong with Working for Exposure?

James and Pat examine the weirdly common practice of lowballing creative professionals or offering ‘exposure’ in lieu of a fee.

Being passionate about your work is a double-edged sword—doing creative work is satisfying and even fun, but it can lead others to assume you love it so much you’ll work for the sheer joy of getting your stuff out into the world. In this segment, Pat and James discuss the complicated landscape of creative gigs, Apple’s egregious abuse of Black History Month in 2019, whether working for ‘exposure’ can be a good idea, and which US cities pay creatives the most.

Share

Questions for you!

When did you last lowball your fee to get a gig? 

When were you last offered a lowball fee or asked to work for exposure? 

What’s a good response to being lowballed? 

Leave a comment

Segment Links!

NPR articles and Duke Study Abstract

https://www.kqed.org/arts/13857471/artist-passion-exploitation-duke-study

https://www.kqed.org/arts/13852882/artists-today-at-apple-unpaid-exposure-money

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37623156/

Helpful tips for getting paid

Discussion about this episode

User's avatar

Ready for more?